User talk:IntGrah

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi IntGrah. Thank you for your work on Brandes' algorithm. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue[edit]

I don't understand why you moved Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue. There is only one. Do you suggest to move the Brandenburg Concertos? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I made a mistake, but my thought process was that if a title is not directly associated with Bach, then it should have some indication of the composer, (parentheses or BWV). For example, Goldberg Variations, Well-Tempered Clavier and St Matthew Passion are almost synonymous with "Bach" by their titles, but Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue, Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, and Overture in the French style are not so much, either because the title is generic or in German. I think Brandenburg Concertos would fall into the former. What do you think of this rule of thumb? Sorry for not discussing this change first. IntGrah (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you moved more than that one. Please consider reverting yourself. You can propose a renaming on WT:Classical music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]