Talk:Subodh Gupta

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: Bihar / Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Inaccuracies on sexual harassment allegations[edit]

If you're editing this page further, please note my edits on the current status of sexual harassment allegations against Subodh Gupta. Previous versions of this article (from 2019) held an inaccurate version of the events (re: potential sensationalism tag). The case has progressed considerably since 2019; the anonymous accuser withdrew the allegation, apologised and the case that Subodh Gupta filed against the anonymous Instagram handle was dropped.

Also: if you're editing this page, do consider what the proper placement of harassment allegations that have since been disproven should be: at the moment, the sexual harassment allegation paragraph's placement makes it appear like the most important thing about him. I'm not sure how similar revisions have been handled, but would appreciate help if anyone's watching this. --Iamnemonic (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be trimmed back to a minimal mention of the incident. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this, thanks for the guidance. Iamnemonic (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've extensively changed this page; can we remove the tags?[edit]

Posting here to get some feedback on whether the tags on this page should be removed. Many of the tags were justified; this was a badly written, grammatically incorrect, shoddily cited article. I have improved it, expanded it and deepened it considerably. I have also added (negative) criticism of the artist's work, which was missing earlier, leading me to believe that some of the tags were completely justified. If a more experienced editor feels the tags may be removed, please do so. Otherwise, perhaps, with some time to consider this, I could do so myself.Iamnemonic (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the message above, I am listing the tags I removed on this article with an explanation of how they were addressed and resolved. (1) Additional citations - added (the article has 15+ new citations from reliable sources (2) COI - the article did read like a résumé which was problematic; while not aware of previous editors' COI, edits were made to include more up-to-date biographical information as well as critical appreciations of the artist's work (3) Article reads like a press release or quotes sensationalist coverage - this too appears to have been true for the previous versions of the article, but as per the point before, extensive edits were made to keep to the most significant and relevant facts so I believe this has been addressed (4) Article reads like a résumé - this has been addressed.

If another editor disagrees with this assessment, please reinstate any tags you feel are justified with an explanation as to why on this talk page, so that those editing this page can help resolve them. Iamnemonic (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]