This page is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
A whole bunch of images have been deleted from Commons and removed from the article, as they appeared to by copyright violations. If there's actually some permission to use those images, with an appropriate license, or if other images are available, we can beef up the gallery again. Dicklyon (talk) 03:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I'll upload new images without copyright issues later. Collecting them. Was misled. Sorry for the confusion. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 13:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing: This appears to be a case of block evasion. I was about to file an SPI, so could you please put this on hold for some time? Thank you. GSS💬 11:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GSS: I've unmarked it as under review. (Started going through those sources, and pretty soon gave up!) The thought of BE occurred to me, too, but couldn't find any obvious connection on a superficial inspection. Will check out your SPI. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing: Thank you, I just saw that. Based on my findings, this is a case of block evasion. I have already shared the details with ArbCom. They are not a sock of user "See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d," but there is a crystal clear connection with user "Marnie Hawes." GSS💬 11:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't able to find a connection with See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d, so I was going to sit on it for a bit, but now that you raise it I also see Marnie Hawes as a possibility. Well spotted. - Bilby (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bilby: I have prepared a detailed case that currently involves three users. Are you interested in reviewing it? GSS💬 13:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to look, but not sure if I can add much. - Bilby (talk) 13:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, it's quite lengthy, so you might want to grab a coffee first. GSS💬 14:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was recently hired to resubmit this page. I am aware of the prior issues. My client had previously hired someone else, with whom I have no relation. It appears your investigation did not find any link to me either. The previous editor did not inform my client that paid editing must be disclosed. Apparently he did disclose it eventually, as I can see it.
It seems unfair for my client to be penalized for the actions of a former editor he hired. Please review the page based on its merits and do not decline it solely due to the use of a paid editor, especially since I have already disclosed my involvement and complied with the necessary guidelines. Could you please reactivate the AFC submission?
BTW, this is the first time I am editing Wikipedia with an account. Previously, I only made random edits as an anonymous user. I am not associated with anyone else, so any assumptions or findings to the contrary are inaccurate. Nancybachi (talk) 23:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there an update in this? Regarding the message that was left by @DoubleGrazing about Refbombing, I have gone ahead and reduced the references where possible. The remaining are all needed and are there to support the content and sentences. The 5 best sources are:
Please have a look at the article again. Again, I am not associated to the prior editor or any other editors. Nancybachi (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
