This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.
Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.
Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.
Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).
You deleted my article on this political party. It is not a company, advertisement or about a particular person. I see no reason why it cant be used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manicman878 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted my page on "Macism", can you send me my material so I can expand on it. I need the information that I already submitted. Also, why delete it? It is real, are you someone that it applies to?
I'M NOT FINISHED YET, PLEASE STOP DELETING MY PAGE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by EHuman875 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You should create the page on your own userpage or keep previewing and adding to it until you feel it is ready to be published to Wikipedia. Editors will quickly mark short and stumpy articles for deletion if there is little material to warrant their existance. --RoyalFool (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
--The Pro Wrestling Chicago page was deleted before I could put up all the links to legitimate promotions in the Chicagoland area, along with a huge article on the area's history, dating back to the 1800's! I can't believe that there could have been any form of advertising, like the clip said about the article. It is not possible to advertise when you are not selling anything but rather are contributing to a vast data base some information that some people like to read about. I do not understand why at the very least there could not have been given some time to put up the article as proof that it is an article about history. To make matters even more confusing, the computer which we use has its IP banned and we cannot figure out two things. They are: how can you sell history? Meaning, history based articles that were to be provided for free as a part of the Wikipedia library, and also why not at least prove any wrongdoing or point any being done? This does not make sense. This isn't meant as any type of disrespect, but other articles were pulled as well, and all of the information that was to be posted is based in historical fact.
and also this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia_(online_game)
it clearly said " This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008)" why do you keep that page?
The deletion is not "because it's a game". It's because you haven't shown that this gaming website meets the notability standards for websites set out at WP:WEB, and you haven't cited reliable sources to show the site's notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
How to show you that website meets the notability ?
Why don't you just open the official website at www.conra.cn?
Hello, I am still wayting for your reply about this issue. --Maximus99 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the original message:
Hi, thanks for your message. Im new in Wikipedia. I added that article because its about an important free software referent and GNU hacker of latin america and because other important figures of the free software foundation as Fernanda G. Weiden, Federico Heinz or Christiano Anderson have acepted articles. Why this case is different? Thanks for your help.
I dont understand why you have deleted this page. This may seem generic term but it is part of IIT Bombay. It has amazing history and its a non profit organization. The need for publicity is very strange reason to delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggerbangtheory (talk • contribs) 18:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I have been trying to create a page for PlanetTogether, and have worked very hard to find references, which I now have, and also to create a completely neutral article.
I was wondering specifically what problems you had with my entry, and if you can help me create a successful entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagej (talk • contribs) 15:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing in the article to indicate that the product is in any way notable, and therefore nothing to show that the article is anything other than an ad for the product. The sources cited are either themselves ads, PR entries, or blogs. See WP:V for a discussion of reliable independent sourcing. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am the manager of a band called the soft pack and you wont allow me to create a wiki for them. This isn't for advertising purposes but strictly for fans to gain a further insight into their history. Please can you allow for me to do this? Thank you.
Not unless you can show that they meet the notability standards of WP:BAND by citing reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good. The next step would be to write an article that cites reliable independent sources to reflect that, and to write it in neutral language and not as advertising. The last article was pure PR, with copy like "a refreshingly stripped-down, revved-up, no-frills brand of raucous rock and roll that, for all of its nods to the past, sounds, miraculously enough, sharply modern yet effortlessly cool, cutting a swathe through anything else out there in the process." You're going to have to eliminate all the promotional language. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure.... can I have the old copy back and I'll edit it accordingly. Apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanatc (talk • contribs) 11:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hope this is all good. many thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanatc (talk • contribs) 12:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember for the next 23.8333333 hours that it is April Fools Day. Stuff like this is just all in good fun, and it's actually an inside joke in another part of Wikipedia. Thanks, X! : Chat 00:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I made a page called The Biography of Sir Ian Andrew de MacLeish and it was deleted by you. Can i please have a copy of it.
Thanks. — Empello (talk • contribs) 02:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My article for the restaurant Pizza Antica was speedily deleted. This is my third request to please get a copy of it for further editing. Please?
MattyIsWiki (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Nawlin, thank you for answering my doubt. I just wanted to know if the page philatino.com or other pages that have links and information to it are an independent source that I could use for posting my article about philatino, . Or publicity of philatino in philatelic journals (if i can scan the journal and where should I upload the pictures).
Thank you!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherrystone_Auctions
This article does not have independent sources. I'm trying to create an article but I can't because all the sources that i find are wrong and now there is an article of philatelic auctions without independent sources and nobody has never deleted it.
Please answer my question, can I use as source other pages that have philatino information?? Or publicity of philatino in philatelic journals.
Thank you.
For the last time -- why don't you read WP:V, which explains sourcing in detail, rather than asking me the same question over and over? I can't answer whether you can use "other pages" if I don't know what they are. PLEASE READ WP:V. And I've deleted Cherrystone Auctions. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
THANK YOU for your patience and your kindness... Of course I READ the WP:V a hundred times but it's not clear about using the webs as an resourse, and as I told you before english is not my lenguage and its my second day using wikipedia. So, thanks for being such a good manager, if you look, you deleted my article 5 times in 2 days, and I modified the text to look better, I didn't post the same text. But this page Cherrystone was in wikipedia for more than 2 years before someone deleted it for first time, are you kidding me???
Again, THANK YOU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvia.Plath07 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm requesting oversight for all edits made by that editor as we speak. TonywaltonTalk 20:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All edits by him now have now been oversighted (including deleted edits), plus those by User:164.58.69.2, his (and his target's) school IP. The IP has trolled for his password before, with posts including his real name (again, oversighted). Any more from that IP and they get a long schoolblock, with the possibility of contacting the school administration. That lot was just nasty. TonywaltonTalk 21:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. :) I wanted to ask your opinion on something. You had reverted some blanking on article I came to today following an OTRS letter. Article, Oxford English Limited. I reblanked, because the material was unsourced, mostly nonsense and troublesome (in my reading) under BLP, with allegations like "The sexual politics of the group was bizarre. One female undergraduate had to organise a complaint from the girls at Wadham College regarding the crepuscular activities of its cult leaders" (which certainly smacks of sexual harassment allegations). That material has now been restored twice. I've opened the question at BLPN, here, but since you had at least some familiarity with the article (maybe in a routine reverting unexplained blanking sense, but, still) wanted to ask your opinion. If the material had been added today, I would wonder if it was some kind of April Fool's joke. Since it wasn't, I'm at a loss. Do you have feedback? --Moonriddengirl(talk) 21:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like either I caught you at a bad time or you don't have an opinion. :) Oh, well. I don't like playing the WP:BLP card (except with clear vandalism); I'm much more comfortable in the copyright realm these days. But maybe somebody at BLPN will offer feedback. Again, the material is just so bizarre that if it hadn't been placed on March 29th, I'd be looking around for Ashton Kutcher. :) Cheers. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 22:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late reply. I support your revert and protection of the page. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. :) We, too, are allowed to have lives. Although an IP editor at my page this morning is questioning my lack thereof. :D (P.S. Thanks for the feedback. I'm still inclined to think this is some kind of joke, but BLPN has been quiet on the matter. :/ I used to participate heavily there before moving over to copyright, which had more dire need. Seems like we have dire need all over.) --Moonriddengirl(talk) 11:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My article for Swanson Russell was speedily deleted. It was submitted prior to adding references and additional contents. Could I have access to edit/re-create the article for submission? Thank you!
Swansonrussell (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind sending me a copy of latest version that you deleted? I promise I had nothing to do with the writing of it :) but I'm curious who did, and what they had to say. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 05:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All true, at least! Hardly advertising... Thanks. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 05:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
00:56, March 30, 2009 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs | block) blocked Messedrocker (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked, e-mail blocked, cannot edit own talk page) with an expiry time of indefinite (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)
Not that I really care about you blocking my former username, but I find it to be an interesting position that I abused it. —harej 11:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right, should have figured. In any case, thank you for preventing some hoodlum from misappropriating my former identity. —harej 18:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question about one of the articles I made that you deleted I would like to talk soon. Thank you for reading this and taking time to talk to me.
I was just wondering how a book by an author that is currently selling copies of said novel worldwide is not considered 'notable'. After reading the book, I felt that a quick and available source of information regarding it would be beneficial. --MedicantBias (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a selfpublished book, and the article cited no reliable independent sources to show that the book has been recognized as notable. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The block log entries should now have been blanked and the accounts hideusered. Cheers. --Rrburke(talk) 05:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Rrburke's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I prodded Parakeet day less than half an hour ago and now it's deleted as both CSD#G3 and expired prod. How can it be an expired prod if it's been less than half an hour? Did someone place a CSD tag between the time I prodded it and the time it was deleted?
Not that I really care for reinstating the article for the sake of process; I think Wikipedia is a better place without that article, but I am concerned about deleting prodded articles without letting the full 5-day period lapse. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While you're at it I'm not 100% sure why you decide to pagemove protect it, but you may as well get {{ROCrecognition}} as well. For that matter, it would make some sense to add it to the note in {{Countries of Asia}}. Please post on my talk if you need me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I would like to request that this page be reinstated - Spice is a very significant non-profit organisation in the UK, that has a unique model for engaging people in rebuilding communities. The article qualified this with independent reports produced by a very reputable think-tank (the new economics foundation), the university of wales and the welsh national government. Both of spice's 'parent' organisations the Young Foundation and the University of Wales, Newport are both included on wikipedia. If this article is not suitable in its present form could you please recommend alterations? Thanks Tris Dyson (talk) 13:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, you caught the whole lot. I've blocked the underlying IP for the Hamish Ross and Grawp socks. Nishkid64(Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you please take a look at this page. It has been revised and hopefully the "advertising" alert can be removed. Thank you.
Jaaq (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but there's nothing in the article to indicate that this book is notable per WP:N. The article about the author, Janie Quinn, has the same problem and is also written like an ad. This is why we have the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for keeping Wikipedia vandal-free. You have work blocked those attack accounts before I even saw them. Abce2 (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Abce2[reply]
Hello -- we're locking & hiding all of these usernames at Meta, which terminates any open sessions and prevents future logins, so there's no need for you to be blocking the accounts locally. — Dan | talk 01:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi; notice you deleted Potato Day, which was perfectly reasonable in its then-current state -- but that's why I hung an {{inuse}} tag on it. I'm currently in the process of turning this into an actual article, so it may spring up again shortly as a non-redirect. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or not... right now, I'm not finding a keep-worthy article in the material I've found so far. Regards,NapoliRoma (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Back again. Please ban the creator, create block/account block... creator also keeps removing CSD tags beyond 4th warning. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First off, thanks for helping me with all those CSD's. Second, I would love it if I could delete the obvious CSD's myself but I need someone to nominate me. Please, check my history: over a year, twinkle/friendly/rollback. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's funny!! I love it. By the way, I changed my username recently and shortly afterwards you blocked my old username Greater Syria, this then autoblocked me for 24 hours due to my IP. Howcome you blocked it? Izzedine (talk) 07:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Would be possible to have clarification over the deletion of the Jen Jeniro page please?
The article was purely factual and did not read like an advertisement in any way. On the 'notability' front, it included quotes from BBC Radio 1 DJs, among other (which, again, isn't promotion, merely an indication of how well a particular record was received - again, purely factual) as well as a full discography.
I can see no possible justification against the existence of the page.
Thanks,
Aled Hughes —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aledramirez (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be better to list this as a stub? This listing was patterned after the pages Moosewood Cookbook and Diet for a Small Planet and I just noticed that they are both stubs. Many thanks. Jaaq (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you take a quick look at this again Panch. Ramalingam
Seems like you moved it before (no wonder it seemed so fast when I went to welcome the user) but the user has recreated it in the article namespace. Don't want to bombard them with CSD's from a non-admin. Thanks. JCutter (talk) 04:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 on the Wikipedia:Notability (music) states this Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart. Being that Breather Life has indeed charted on borh the Top R&B/Hip-Albums and Top Independent Albums, I think that this article should be restored. Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know you, so this is not entirely accurate; but in light of this - [1] - and seeing your recent activity since then, I'm reminded of Salah's quote to Indy and Marion in Raiders of the Lost Ark: "Oh, my good friends... I'm so pleased you're not dead!" Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots 08:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. We created a page on one of our local citizens and within seconds it was deleted. We took the time to make sure that everything was in order, we had legitimate sources and within seconds it was all gone. Jonathan Van Barneveld may not be a global name, but to our local region he is quite well known and we feel that he deserves a wikipedia page for everything he has contributed to the communities in the region. We are formally requesting that you overturn the speedy delete that was placed on the page. Please. It would mean a lot to all the people who had input to his page.
User: British Columbian —Preceding unsigned comment added by British Columbian (talk • contribs) 04:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Heavens, I've never been indeffed before. Must be careful. I don't actually intend to be disruptive. Warmest regards, Hamlet, Prince of Trollmark (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why was my kacko page deleted? I'm new here and I was just wondering why. It's actually a word, believe it or not. Kacko123 (talk) 10:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be one of those "words I made up that can mean anything you want it to mean". That's not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:NFT and WP:NAD. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but it is a well known word where I come from. But never mind, I understand that rules are rules. Could I at least have the deleted page given back to me? Thank you. Kacko123 (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did some major trimming to the article and added sources. And have now just found and added multiple awards from various organizations... 2005: Aegis Awards Winners and finalists recognition[2], 2006: two awards at the 27th annual Telly Awards[3], 2007: they won a Radio-Television News Directors Association of the Carolinas (RTNDAC) Award for "Best Student Television Newscast".[4], 2008: Three awards at the 29th annual Telly Awards[5], and the 2009 Broadcast Education Association awards[6][7]. I think it has enough independent notability after being trimmed and properly sourced to exist as a stand-alone. Best regards, Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 00:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed you temporarily blocked User talk:216.154.41.11 - he's been at it again though since. Perhaps something slightly more drastic is needed? Cheers Akerbeltz (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say thank you for reverting that vandalism on my user page.
Oldlaptop321 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
But noticed your names on some pages where you cleaned up vandalism... Just wanted to make myself noticed and say hi :) JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 07:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What could I have done to make the article on world wide dream builders more relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvolveInc (talk • contribs) 21:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted this page within an hour of it being created before there was even time to post references, supporting articles or such. You posted no revelent info on the talk page. Making a solo call on what you think is revelent isn't the wiki way...it might be your way but it's the wrong way. Terryrayc (talk) 22:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh it should also be noted that a quick search found a lot of articles on web based games, I see you are picking and choosing. Terryrayc (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You guys deleted it while I was still creating the page, I have several independent reviews and sources to support the page
I would think you could at least have waited for me to finish the article so User:Vianello could read before jumping into conclusion that it's not supported by reliable independent sources or doesnt meet notability guidelines.
How's one supposed to contribute to the wiki if articles are deleted while it is still being created.
Could you imagine emailing me the content of the page at deletion? I don't normally expect a review recreation of the page for CSD DRVs but an emailed version would make it easier to form an opinion. Thanks! Usrnme h8er (talk·contribs) 23:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just wondering why the Kogan Technologies page was deleted? I modelled it on the Sony page, and referenced everything, including positive and negative commentary. Is it possible to get the original content back so I can make appropriate changes? I was contributing to the article so someone may have made some changes to it that were 'advertorial' but I haven't seen them, so not sure where the issues lied. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vushkin (talk • contribs) 09:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advise. Thanks for the constructive comments. Can I however get the original content put back as a draft so it can be worked on further? Is that at all possible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vushkin (talk • contribs) 15:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That's what I get when I trust people and just copy/paste. --Kbdank71 14:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You Deleted my first article, its not a promotion.[edit]
Hey, hope all is well. I am not sure why my article on Merchant cash Advances was deleted. Can you please provide me with a little more info so that I can take the necessary steps to qualify the article?
3 of the four links are to articles written by journalist with references form CEO's of Merchant Cash Advance Companies. This is the same as a reference to an article with the CEO of Bank of America. Only one link goes to an actual company and that is because the information is pertinent and that is where I found the information. I can search elsewhere if you need me to.
The topic is not covered any more than "Adjustable Rate Mortgage" is covered by "Mortgage." That is why there is an article for each one. This is a particular factoring product that is new and the industry is growing. For Wiki to not have this information would be an injustice to people and the reason for its existance.
The information is good information and relevent. I truly beieive this information is important. Please let me know what changes would need to be made in order for this to be worthy of submission.
Dear Nawlinwiki,
I could use some help on the page I am making.
I have a screenshot to put up, but I don't really know what I am doing. Could you talk to me and help me make it?
Ken Durham: just a quick note, that page has been tagged for speedy deletion, it may or may not be deleted, in the meantime feel free to edit it, but note that any edits you make may be deleted and lost, all the best SpitfireTally-ho! 18:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Request the article Flight 29 Down be semi-protected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ken Durham (talk • contribs) 19:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NawlinWiki, the page you deleted wasn't intended to be deleted (note the associated talk page is still there).
Based on discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wine, RonaldMcWendys intended to delete the mainspace redirects to his sub-page. Being a new user, he got confused when trying to edit the redirect, and he instead ended up putting the {{db-author}} tag on his sub-page.
I've been advising him and trying to help him out. Deleting his sub-page was not what he intended. Would you restore User:RonaldMcWendys/Captûre Wines please, and instead delete the two mainspace redirects to that user subpage: Captûre Wines and Capture Wines. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The guidelines specify: "A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia." I have claimed significance and therefore may avoid speedy deletion, despite your contest. Also, with respect to the first comment, the editor made a mistake in claiming that my article met the criteria for speedy deletion because, "Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion." Give me more time and I will find more sources that demonstrate notability to a reasonable level. The guidelines say that requirement is not specific (rather a rule of thumb), so how I do know what is acceptable? (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the article now meets the guidelines. I don't think anyone can consider Florida's largest newspaper to be a non trivial publication, nor a statewide musical competition(talk) 01:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I deserve a specific explanation for your 'direct attack' of my writing... as well as the junk about 'unverifiable'... did you actually view the links, or just 'click' it out as soon as you saw something you did not like??? In addition, I read what 'fair' is supposed to be about, so you need to clarify what's going on.
By the way, did you see the fair and balanced perspective I offered the reader?
Everything in that article is factual and/or common knowledge, and I referenced specific links, especially the direct link from socialism and communism to the most recent type of American Liberalism in the US. As well as the quote from Rosie O'donnell and Janet N. So what got your goat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ImaPatriot (talk • contribs) 23:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Um, you were lightning fast deleting my page... how about the response to WHY your deleted it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ImaPatriot (talk • contribs) 00:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what you're talking about. Your logs show no deleted article called "American Liberals", nor do I have any record of having deleted such an article, nor is there any history of *anyone* having created such an article. In fact, this account was created just a few hours ago, and I haven't done any editing in that time, until now. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I, Bugboy52.4, award you for reaching 100,000 edits according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits generated 11:45 pm, 24 February 2009. Keep up the good work!________________________________________________________________
Hi NawlinWiki you deleted an article today "韩鸿翼" (A1: Not enough context to identify article's subject: A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) just curious how you came to the conclusions you did, can you speak the language that the article is wrote in and if not how can you assertain that it fails A1 and/or A7. Thanks BigDuncTalk 13:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate is awfully handy. :) NawlinWiki (talk) 01:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hey i made my band's bio on wikipedia and it got deleted saying i didn't do it right. tho i copied the same stuff from an already existing band and just replaced the names and links. how can the copy of an already band be mistaken? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LasombraQ (talk • contribs) 02:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I'd like to request a reconsideration for the article on USAloe, a notable company here in Carlsbad. Claude Lewis, mayor of Carlsbad (and my boss), requested the article. The company has been around for 37 years, and is suddenly the fastest growing company in the county. We feel they deserve some recognition.
You'll need to find reliable independent sources (see WP:V) showing that the company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP. It's not enough that you or the mayor think the company is notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the links and resources in the article speak for themselves. After the acquisition of the company last year and launch of their new line of products this year, they have become a nationwide phenomenon (and major employer for our community) with no signs of slowing down.
User:Dlohcierekim has given you a Macrophage! Macrophages promote WikiLove through infiltration and by smiling on those who keep Wikipedia healthy by increasing its resistance to vandalism. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! --~~~~
Hello Nawlin, you have deleted my first article "Defactory" because of "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". I have tried to formulate it as a different Wikipedia articles describing content management systems, such as for example Site Foundry, but you have deleted it so quickly, so I even can't write more than just a paragraph. What's the problem with it? Thanks for your reply! --Luccano (talk) 15:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Truthprophecy1992 (talk·contribs) came onto the IRC help, claiming that this edit wasn't vandalism, and that they should not have received a 'final warning' for it.
In discussion, it would appear that the editor is trying to do things the right way - so, in spite of their history, I have assumed good faith, removed the warning, and advised them a little on the importance of references.
I hope you won't object to the warning being removed; I do believe that the edit had good intentions. I only removed the final warning - the other is still in place.
I will, of course, try to check on the users future edits.
Thanks for your time, best, Chzz ► 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 of the four links are to articles written by journalist with references form CEO's of Merchant Cash Advance Companies. This is the same as a reference to an article with the CEO of Bank of America. Only one link goes to an actual company and that is because the information is pertinent and that is where I found the information. I can search elsewhere if you need me to.
The topic is not covered any more than "Adjustable Rate Mortgage" is covered by "Mortgage." That is why there is an article for each one. This is a particular factoring product that is new and the industry is growing. For Wiki to not have this information would be an injustice to people and the reason for its existance.
The information is good information and relevent. I truly beieive this information is important. Please let me know what changes would need to be made in order for this to be worthy of submission.
I'm handing this project over to someone else who is experienced with writing Wikipedia articles - he will make the required changes and resubmit this soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EcuadorHomesOnline (talk • contribs) 11:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For you information, to delete is deletrior in Gourdinian,
Yours Sincerely,
OllyOlyosia —Preceding unsigned comment added by OllyOlyosia (talk • contribs) 14:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I hope I am doing this correctly. As I was typing hangon, and my explanation about Dancey & Cassady, L.L.P., the posting was deleted. I still do not think it should have been deleted. It was not advertising, and merely the history of how Dancey & Cassady, L.L.P. came into being. I am not trying to be difficult, but it seems to a rush to judgment. Thank you for your time, and consideration. Richcass (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that this person is real quick to try and delete whatever he can with out truly looking at what they are deleting, or the criteria for which Wikipedia has put forth. Please Nawlin try to do a good job, and not just delete as many articles as possible. You are not serving the community when you are too quick to make judgements with out taking a second to actually look at what you are doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GATigers (talk • contribs) 19:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted my page on Step3 Consulting. I have been an employee of the company for 13 years but made an honest effort to maintain a neutral point of view. I am not sure at which point you deleted the page – I had started with a section on the company and its history, and then later added a description of the company’s products. When adding the products, I included two independent references, one online and one as reference to an industry publication (I can share a pdf). My colleagues and I interact with thousands of different people every year, and I believe those people would have an interest in looking up additional information on Wikipedia.
I appreciate your perspective and Wikipedia’s view on maintaining a neutral point of view. Could you help me understand how I could improve my article – would the article without the description of the products be less advertising?
Thanks for your time.
Yergie atl (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An article which starts with "provides its clients with sustainable profitability and performance improvements" and ends with "Customer value and performance requirements guide a Total Quality initiative with the goal of producing zero defects" is not neutral -- which just shows how hard it is to write a neutral article when you have a conflict of interest (see WP:COI). It's hard for me to give pointers -- the whole article appears to be written with an eye towards attracting clients by describing your company's services in the best possible light. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm researching web content management and have noticed that there are a lot of places that reference products that are out there (i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_content_management) and i noticed that another vendor, ektron wasn't listed. so digging a little deeper, i noticed that they didn't have a page so i looked at some of the similar listings and tried to match up the tone of each of them so that it wouldn't come off to be promotional. i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/sitecore vs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ektron?
is it the references? i hadn't finished the article...but i was planning on finding some great references.
any feedback on this situation would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lethanek93 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's the way the article is written. It starts with "committed to providing revolutionary, scalable Web content management and authoring solutions", continues by addressing the reader as "you" (as if the reader were a potential customer), and finishes with "Ektron understands what it takes to make your Internet, intranet or extranet project successful." See WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know on other wikis (aka ED, Uncyc, and Wikia sites) video embedding, usually by youtube, is possible. Does Wikipedia have a coding to embed youtube videos (I would just want to embed one onto my userpage, nothing unappropriate)? - Nite OwlII 04:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted the article Floatopia about 2 years ago. This event that occurred only gained about 600 participants in 2007, but this year over 12,000 people attended. Troysteinbauer (talk) 06:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can I please have the deleted "Rick Fairless" article back to remove what might be considered "advertisement" and to striclty give factual information on his life and business accomplishments? There are several other pages that mention Rick Fairless: [Texas Hardtails], [Strokers Dallas], [Biker Build-Off], so I think it is worth him having a page of his own to list his accomplishments within the motorcycle industry. It's no different than Paul Teutul Sr. having his own page. Thank you. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Sir you are deleting again and again my article plz inform me why you are doing so[edit]
Sir I saw many pages about different schools on wikipedia so i wanted to add a little description about my school from here i got my high school diploma but you are again and again deleting that page if you want then im giving you whole the information about my school with reliable references so if my article do not meet your requirements then create the article yourself if you do not have enough time to create it then tell me what should i do to create an article about my school? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asif zeb008 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sir you are deleting again and again my article plz inform me why you are doing so[edit]
Sir I saw many pages about different schools on wikipedia so i wanted to add a little description about my school from here i got my high school diploma but you are again and again deleting that page if you want then im giving you whole the information about my school with reliable references so if my article do not meet your requirements then create the article yourself if you do not have enough time to create it then tell me what should i do to create an article about my school? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asif zeb008 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure you graduated from high school? I wouldn't have guessed it from the way you write. It is customary to capitalize the word "I" and usually you would want to end sentances with a period. Just a suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EcuadorHomesOnline (talk • contribs) 20:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am known on other wiki projects under the username SuperJew (Commons, Hebrew Wiki, WikiQuote, Hebrew Wkiquote, Hebrew Wikisource). The page here under User:SuperJew is unused and there is not even a welcome sign on the talk page. Could this page please be deleted so that I can create a SuperJew account here and have all of Wiki fully merged under SuperJew? I plan on working on the requested Audio and Pictures.
When you do so, can you please let me know by leaving me a message on one of the aforementioned talk pages.
It appears that there is an existing User:SuperJew here on the English Wikipedia, although it looks like a very old account (pre-2005) that has never made any edits. If you want to claim that name here, you should go to Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations and follow the instructions there. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will try that. --SuperJew —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.47.253 (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All though I still don't forgive for taking part in the deletion of my pages, I still want to patch things up with you. BUT if you had have taken the time to do the research and see that most of the articles I created were true then maybe we would'nt have this beef between us.
I forgive you and I so sorry for my foolishness. Do you forgive me? Please!
