Talk:Transgender
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transgender article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about transgender people. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about transgender people at the Reference desk. |
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
how can vatican's guidelines be dated in the future?[edit]
> Dated October 31, 2024
is this supposed to be 2023? 86.127.80.188 (talk) 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Exactly that. I've fixed it. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ga 174.103.242.116 (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
"Transgenderism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Transgenderism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 9 § Transgenderism until a consensus is reached. Raladic (talk) 03:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The word transgenderism[edit]
This falls foul of WP:NOTFORUM as it has nothing to do with improving the article. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Okay... this bothers me so much that I just have to have to make a thread about it. I wrote the article ICD-11, which includes a section about Gender incongruence. In it, I used the term transgenderism. It was removed by User:Raladic, because it was supposedly an insult!! They even nominated the transgenderism redirect (see above), pointing out that some idiots used that word to claim that transgenderism is an ideology, instead of an inborn condition. And that's why no one should use that word. What kind of nonsense is this?! So just because a few alt-right bozos are unable to understand gender, we should not use this word, because *they* said so?? Transgenderism is an -ism. Isms don't just refer to ideologies, but to phenomena in general (journalism, realism, recidivism), including scientific phenomena (magnetism, Darwinism, atavism). From an etymological viewpoint, there is nothing inherently insulting about the word transgenderism. In itself, it is a neutral, general-purpose term for all things related to being transgender. You can throw in all the sources that say otherwise, but those people are WRONG! Thus, User:Raladic is also wrong for calling it a slur, because it's not. Thanks for reading. - Manifestation (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The part of some identifying as transexual is depreciated and redundant. Transsexual was replaced by transgender to remove sexual annotation that Gender Identity relates to sexual orientation. It has been depreciated as a derogatory term: similar to Asperger's being replaced with ASD in the DSM5 because if the negative history for it as well. StonyPonyAmy (talk) 00:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- A reliable source would be needed for such a change (also, edit requests should include an exact change). Its true that broadly describing trans people, transness, or medical transition as transsexual(s/ism) has largely fallen out of favor, but this sentence is about the minority of trans people (mostly older people, or subscribers to transmedicalism) who identify with the term as an individual identity label. –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 01:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Counterpoint: Buck Angel EvergreenFir (talk) 05:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 May 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the visual anchor for the transfeminine to not include the transmasculine anchor.
Change the transmasculine definition to include a visual anchor.
This can be seen in the diff-like below:
< ''{{visanc|Transfeminine|Transmasculine}}'' is a term for any person, binary... --- > ''{{visanc|Transfeminine}}'' is a term for any person, binary or non-binary... < ''Transmasculine'' refers to a person, binary or non-binary... --- > ''{{visanc|Transmasculine}}'' refers to a person, binary or non-binary...
Serxka (talk) 08:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Dead link[edit]
The "main article" link in #Pride symbols doesn't work. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like the LGBT symbols page doesn't sort based on identity but based on type of symbols (gender symbols, flags, plants & animals, etc.). I imagine the best fix may be to put LGBT symbols as a see also, without a section tag? Or just call it a main page even though it discusses other pride symbols?
- --Malvoliox (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Top-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- Old requests for LGBT studies peer review
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- Top-importance Gender studies articles
- Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Unknown-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles