Talk:Todos Los Romances

Todos Los Romances has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 9, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Todos Los Romances/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 14:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

albums in which Miguel covers → past tense
four of the five stars → four out of five srats
and peaked at number 12 on the Billboard Top Latin Albums → and peaked at number 12 on Billboard's Top Latin Albums chart

Infobox[edit]

Flawless ;)

Background and release[edit]

The "main articles" header is superfluous as the articles are already mentioned in the section's body.
The album, which was produced by Armando Manzanero and arranged by Bebu Silvetti, → Produced by ..., the record
certified gold → certified Gold
It received a Grammy nomination for Best Latin Pop Album and sold over seven million copies. → You already talked about its sales before
and Kiko Cibrian co-produced with Miguel, and it won a → and Kiko Cibrian co-produced the record with Miguel, with it winning a
Todos Los Romances which the contains → comma before "which" + remove "the"

Reception[edit]

on the Spanish Albums Chart and sold → on the Spanish Albums Chart, selling
200,000 copies in the country.[13] The album was also certified double Platinum by the Productores de Música de España for shipping 200,000 → 200,000 copies in the country and gaining a double Platinum certification awarded by Pro...
on the Billboard Top Latin Albums → as in the lead
number 6 → number six (not above ten)

Charts[edit]

Flawless ;)

Certifications[edit]

Flawless ;)

Other stuff[edit]

Copy-violation[edit]

2.0% is super!

Links[edit]

No problems here!

References[edit]

As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article (I can't verify the books, so I trust you with this!)
No dead links! Good job!

Outcome[edit]

Apart from a few issues, you did a great job with the article. On hold for 7 days! Best and good luck, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to work on it this Saturday hopefully. Erick (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cartoon network freak: Yo! Just addressed everything that was brought in the review. Thanks for taking your time to review this article! =D Erick (talk) 22:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gladly passing! Congrats, Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.