This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Speedy deletion is not appropriate under Section A7 since claims of significance or importance given is indeed credible:
Two claims of significance are given: The first being that the organization is routinely cited by reputable news media outlets (such as The New York Times and Associated Press) as a monitoring institution in a major global conflict; the second being that it has been cited by the United Nations.
Both claims are cited and credible.
Looks like this silly nomination deletion is a thing of the past, but I agree 100% with previous comment. SNHR us regularly cited by media and therefore is notable - in fact, given contentiousness of news on Syria, it is vital that Wikipedia works towards good quality articles on the sources. Article should be expanded not deleted. BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]