This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved - no consensus. Although lots of support for the motion, concerns from opposers were not clearly/directly addressed during the discussion. (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support a split between the footballers, film and card game. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator. No clear primary topic for this title. The safest bet is to have the disambiguation page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The given name is the clear primary topic. The footballers have it as their given name! -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination; Shwcz; Crouch, Swale; Paintspot Infez and Ortizesp. There are 22 bulleted entries listed upon the Pedro (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the renown of the masculine given name is at such a level that it overshadows the combined notability of the remaining 21 entries. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 19:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The mononymous uses of Pedro on the separate disambiguation page are misplaced, because they're anthroponymy entries that are just fine at the existing main article.
I've gone through the other anthroponymy lists in this RM spurt, and simply added the mononyms first. Here, it doesn't seem to be so clear, because there's also sections for monarchs, etc. Should the laundry list of footballers named mononymously 'Pedro' go above or below other mononymous uses? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I put them below, but above the other sportspeople. I also integrated the missing ones from the disambiguation page. Hopefully this actually helps navigation, with people who are searching for these being actually able to find them here. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning oppose on the strength of most of the topics listed as ambiguous actually being instances of the name. BD2412T 02:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. — Amakuru (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per BD2412 since I was going to write almost exactly that: Most subjects on the disambiguation page are instances of the name. Pretty WP:PRIMARYTOPIC right there. Steel1943 (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The given name is the primary topic; none of the other dab entries are anywhere close to as significant. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.