This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
I am not going to edit the article directly, because I was asked to by a since-blocked user in a decidedly non-neutral way and I want to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. However, while there are apparently legitimate concerns about COI and sockpuppetry, their objection to labelling Aeschilman an "innkeeper and B&B owner" appears valid. This appears both in the lead and infobox but not in the body of the article (violating WP:LEAD). The only source given is not only primary, but doesn't mention Aeschliman at all. Googling Aeschliman suggests that it is true that he and his wife own property in Italy which they rent out as holiday cottages, but I cannot find any reliable sources which would suggest that it's WP:DUE in this article, let alone that it's important enough to get equal billing in the lead with his academic work. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anything in a BLP that fails verification should be removed immediately. I have done so rather than protecting the article again. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good edits, and it is likely that I should've removed the B&B bit myself. The revert to an old version restored a lot of puffery and an overlong publications list, which is why I reverted. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
