Talk:List of urban legends

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of urban legends article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Cecily Mauran (February 5, 2022). "10 Wikipedia rabbit holes to fall down instead of doomscrolling". Mashable.
"The Urban Legends Wikipedia Page Is Full of Fakes, But Who Cares? [Guide to the Unknown]". Bloody Disgusting. April 26, 2024.

extremely poor sources[edit]

can the citations (and maybe the entries as well) to the damn "only in your state" website be removed? it's clearly not a reliable source by any stretch and there are multiple entries on the page citing it Fox Room (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have 11 references to that site. I checked two. Both were credited to professional travel writers. I do not care to check them all. You will have to take up each citations one at a time and say why it is not reliable. I will grant you it is not a scholarly source, but that does not equate to unreliable. If a better source can be found, you are welcome to replace any of the citations, but I would not support removing them categorically. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"not scholarly" is putting it mildly. it's clearly a clickbait article, and i do not trust its claims to be remotely reliable. obviously leaving the entries without a citation would be silly but if one does exist it should be used, and if it does not exist then the entry should be removed. if someone else hasn't cared to do it the next time i remember about this i'll do it myself Fox Room (talk) 06:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Podcast, might interest editors of this list[edit]

"This is Guide to the Unknown‘s 10th episode working down the Wikipedia page of urban legends, and they’re only on the 4th letter of the alphabet. Will they make it to the end before they reach their graves?" Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summarized a bit in this article. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 20:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]