Talk:John Crakehall

John Crakehall has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 10, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from John Crakehall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although the medieval Lord High Treasurer John Crakehall was a clergyman sworn to celibacy, he had a daughter to whom he left part of his estate?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Crakehall.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK nom[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/John Crakehall

insertion of material[edit]

Inserting new material into an already cited section is implying that the new material is supported by the citation. Unfortunately, the recent edits are NOT covered by the sources. And some edits have removed the supporting citations from material that was cited. This article was fully cited before and now it’s no longer complying with our sourcing policies. Pleas learn how to add information before doing further edits. Ealdgyth - Talk 11:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the relevant policy and guideline is at WP:INTEGRITY. Ealdgyth - Talk 11:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source...[edit]

here -- Ealdgyth (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Crakehall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 13:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"If John was Elias' son" - I'm sure this is a variant spelling of Ellis, but it's probably best to stick with one spelling
- Nope, just me typoing. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So they commemorated his death before he actually died?
- I tried to clarify. No, I don't know why they did the commemoration on the 5th, when he died between 8-10 September. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"treasuerer" - is this a spelling error or a technical term?
- I can spell, really! Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"and eventually to civil war in 1264" - Piped link Second Barons' War here?
- Linked, but not piped. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is the "edi" at the end of the long citation for Jobson 2010 intentional and signifying something or an accidental inclusion?
- Typo, removed. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's all from me. Hog Farm _Talk 15:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got all these? Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]