Talk:Freccia IFV

Military history: Land vehicles / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Split "Centauro II" in its own article?[edit]

Seeing the back and forth going on in this article - wouldn't it be appropriate the transfer all the info about the Centauro II into its own article? Like at the Italian wikipedia: Centauro, Freccia, Centauro II. noclador (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed the Centauro II was a subsection here, so I apologize for that. Nonetheless, I don't see why that section is in this article and not the Centauro one in the first place. Even if it's a common platform, the Centauro and Freccia have different purposes. It'd be like putting all vehicles based off the T-72 incorporated in the T-90 article (itself a development of the T-72). Similarly, the A2, A3, A4 etc versions of the Leopard 1 are included in the same article, whereas the Leopard 2 is a separate one. IMO the Centauro II should just be a subsection in the Centauro article. Strictly speaking we could have a separate article but it could be argued it's unnecessary. FelipeFritschF (talk) 09:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]