Talk:Effective number of parties

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The link is dead...

It's working today. Biscuittin (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision made by DFRussia undone. DFR's claim that 'The paper references is uncited suggesting it is not an important one in Poli Sci right now' is a lie, because the paper reference is properly provided as 'Golosov, Grigorii V. (2010): The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach. Party Politics 16:171-192.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.205.250.52 (talk) 21:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needed text[edit]

The text of this article needs to explain why one might prefer the Laakso-Taagepera or the Golosov indexes. Also, to my knowledge, most researchers rely on the former index; although the Golosov one may be better for some purposes, this needs to be explained and justified in this article, not just in the referenced paper by Golosov.~Mack2~ (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Political groups of the European Parliament[edit]

It would be interesting to calculate this for the political groups of the European Parliament. Kaihsu (talk) 10:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]