Draft talk:Pulsechain

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Draft	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This page is supported by Networking task force.

Cryptography: Computer science Draft‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Draft	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This page is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Dear Wiki editors and reviewers,

This draft is since a long time my first edit since I joined your community 19 years ago in 2005.
I am a a 51 year old WP edtior with a scientific background and I am interested about Pulsechain why I follow the topic since its testnet inception & mainnet deployment.

Relevance:
There is a massive public interest about Pulsechain which is being indicated by the gigantic resource availability in digital & social media and justifies the need for an encyclopedic resource about the topic thus, I feel it is encyclopedic relevant to cover a Blockchain that is backed by 50,000 validators around the world.

Current status:

The page was initially rejected due to poor references that were mainly crypto news portal related. I was 19 years absent from WP. I got that. Fair point.
I accepted the first rejections. Sections were purged, re-written, partial contents self-critically removed and re-written in a neutral PoV compliance way.
I officially requested AfC submission assistance on the talkpage of David Gerard (section Pulsechain) who professionally advised me. Thanks David.
I highlighted and elaborated in detail on David Gerard's talkpage that I do not have a commercial ambitions. Here again for your reference: I am not paid and neither a social influencer nor on any payroll related to any online or crypto topic, as evidence I highlight a long WP trackrecord of ~1000 edits since 2005 in the German Wikipedia covering many topics and many new pages created. Not any single page was crypto related so it is very obvious that I don't do this for money. I develop OpenSource Software since 30 years which shows my non-commercial intrinsic motivation as well.
The article meets the Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#News_organizations guidelines and Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Cryptocurrencies criteria in my opinion. If not, talk to me.

As such, the article is now crypto agnostic and delivers facts that can be peer reviewed through quality references. If you disagree, please have an intellectual dialogue in this section and support the aim to document Pulsechain on Wikipedia by directly editing the draft article or having a conversation.

Reviewers/Approvers: Kindly elevate the article into WP namespace in order to give it a further chance to evolve, make edits directly or precisely share your thoughts what's wrong with references. Thanks. --Mgloor (talk) - 17:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update from June 2024: It's time to bring this page on-line to WP main namespace. Page in DRAFT namespace since March (4 months), not challenged since weeks. All concerns eliminated. --Mgloor (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]