Wikipedia:Files for discussion
![]() | Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page |
Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What not to list here[edit]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instructions for listing files for discussion Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:
State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:
Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:
These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones. If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used. If you have general questions about a file and/or its copyright status, then please start a new thread at Media Copyright Questions. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Instructions for discussion participation[edit]
In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:
- Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
- Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
- Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use
Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.
Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons'''
, you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.
Instructions for closing discussions[edit]
Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.
Old discussions[edit]
The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:
May 18
File:The Supremes - Someday We'll Be Together (Italy).png
- File:The Supremes - Someday We'll Be Together (Italy).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JonathanLGardner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The other image File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together.png was uploaded first and should be used instead for now. Per WP:NFCC#3a, using more than one cover art of same recording discouraged. George Ho (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong keep: There is no need to delete it. The cover nominated is specific to Italy, which is used exclusively in supported countries => alternative cover. You just only need to change its position in the infobox (this file go to the top, and the Italian version goes down). Alternative or specific covers doesn't mean it is a main cover so it doesn't violate the first of the third criterion.
- Kys5g talk! 09:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Kys5g: I'm sorry, but being in the wrong (top) position is not the main reason for deleting this image. (I'll put the other image on top most likely when this image is deleted.) Furthermore, an image being Italian is also not a reason I nominated this image. When I said "uploaded first", I meant that the other image was uploaded much earlier than this one. Also, even swapping images still doesn't prevent this image from failing NFCC.
- The image was uploaded because more likely it looks different from the other. However, the info provided by the cover art isn't much (if not at all) different from that of the other cover art. BTW, one admin has been concerned at your talk pageabout the way you've voted. George Ho (talk) 10:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Seal of Unalaska, Alaska.png
- File:Seal of Unalaska, Alaska.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Indefatigable2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is difficult to reach the minimum threshold for copyright protection if it only consists of simple circular geometric shapes and text. The fair use label should be replaced by {{PD-textlogo}}. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 05:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relicense per nom and undelete larger version. - Eureka Lott 00:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Unalaska, Alaska logo.png
- File:Unalaska, Alaska logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Indefatigable2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Simple text arrangement alone is unlikely to meet the minimum threshold for copyright protection, and the fair use label should be replaced with {{PD-textlogo}}. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relicense per nom and undelete larger version. - Eureka Lott 22:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bill Clinton Boulevard2.jpg
- File:Bill Clinton Boulevard2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Genjix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I requested its undeletion, since Kosovo now has liberal Freedom of Panorama, thinking that it may show the Bill Clinton statue or one of the buildings along the road. My assumption went wrong (mostly due to deleted files not visible to me as a non-admin). The main object here is a billboard, and Kosovar FoP does not cover works that are typically mean for temporary exhibition, inclusive of most billboards. If the underlying image of Bill Clinton is from a freely-licensed US government source, then it can be kept and transferred to Commons under a suitable PD-USGov tag. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Addition: The image I nominated dates to ca. 2010. A Commons file that incidentally includes the billboard is c:File:American flag on Bill Clinton Boulevard in Prishtinë.jpg (dates to 2018) which shows a very different billboard: a proof that Bill Clinton billboard here is not meant to be permanent. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment is the Kosovo law applied retroactively, or just going forward? -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 14:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is irrelevant. The image was uploaded in 2010, during the time the Kosovar law was more restrictive, not allowing commercial FoP. The latest reform (which was made last year) does not help as only permanently-placed artistic works (like buildings and sculptures) can be freely used in images. This billboard (not a "mural" as the uploader erroneously called) is not permanent. Serbian copyright law is not applicable as the act of uploading was in 2010, not before 2007. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- And finally, even if Serbian FoP is claimed courtesy of date of photography, c:COM:FOP Serbia only covers permanently-placed works. As both the Serbian FoP and the new Kosovar FoP do not cover temporary works, this billboard is almost certainly not covered and this file is "doomed to be nuked." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
May 17
File:Escapade (play).jpg
- File:Escapade (play).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord Cornwallis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is not a faithful two-dimensional reproduction of the play's poster (pamphlet?). Someone could take a photo of it and release the photo under a free license, per WP:FREER as well as WP:GETTY, point 16. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Public domain in the US at the very least. The nominator's claim (if I understand correctly) is that (1) there is no copyright in the poster/pamphlet, but (2) there is a copyright in the photograph because it has minor three-dimensional elements. To (1), the poster/pamphlet is {{PD-simple}} typesetting, below the US threshold of originality. To (2), the official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". Here, the pamphlet is a two-dimensional work, even though there are some minor folds in the photograph. (JohnCWiesenthal I am misunderstanding "faithful two-dimensional reproduction", please let me know!) Wikiacc (¶) 21:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is no creativity in the reproduction and no copyright in the image. But the text is copyrightable; some creative effort has gone into selecting and positioning the words, particularly the paragraphs at the bottom. Accordingly the fair use claim currently on the file is the appropriate licence. Do nothing. Stifle (talk) 07:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Benedictine College Wordmark.png
- File:Benedictine College Wordmark.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corkythehornetfan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non free images- as well as WP:NFCC#8, as it doesn't significantly enhance the article any more than the actual college logo itself. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wonder whether {{PD-textlogo}} might apply here. Clear delete if not (NFCC#10c also not met). Stifle (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think textlogo would apply given the B and cross device on the left, but whether that qualifies as sufficiently creative to be PD anyway I don't know. Thryduulf (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: My question is how is it different than any other university article on Wikipedia? It's not violating any guidelines. Corky 03:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
For older nominations, see the archives.
Discussions approaching conclusion[edit]
Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.
May 19[edit]
File:Cryptopunks general.jpg[edit]
- File:Cryptopunks general.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Munmula (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The rationale said that the image was created using a computer algorithm, but images generated by a computer algorithm are ineligible for copyright because it does not contain sufficient human authorship to support a copyright claim, unless it was made in the UK or Hong Kong. Kys5g talk! 04:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The avatar used by Fat Cat during his lifetime.jpg[edit]
- File:The avatar used by Fat Cat during his lifetime.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheGreatPeng (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
WP:NFCC#8: Contextual significance. This is only the avatar of Fat Cat (Pangmao) which contributes little to reader's understanding of the topic. Fat Cat was not an online celebrity so this meme-avatar cannot serve as "visual identification" as the rationale have said. The phrase "I don't want vegetables, I want McDonald's" on the avatar can be conveyed by text, which the article already had. — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 18:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Idk but if you are correct, if also needed, open a discussion on vn version of that photo. TheGreatPeng (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Recent nominations[edit]
May 20[edit]
File:Wham! featuring George Michael US release.jpeg[edit]
- File:Wham! featuring George Michael US release.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Faith16 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The North American (or US) cover art was de-PRODded without rationale, so I can't help wonder what I'm missing when reading the article and looking at the cover arts. Sure, this cover art credits "Wham! Featuring George Michael", while the other cover art solely credits "George Michael".
However, is it needed, and would deleting this cover art detriment the understanding of the topic in question? Do both cover arts convey same or different information? Is the understanding of the song inadequate without this (American) cover art? Honestly, there's already one (British) cover art, but I just now see an extra cover art uploaded and then inserted about five years ago. George Ho (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per this discussion. Deleting this will cause a disruption of detriment the understanding of the topic in question, and both covers provides both the same and the different facts. This is an alternative cover so it can't violate both criterions. The song is also inadequate without the American one, cause this is a country-specific cover, and specific covers are distinctive with global versions. This image was also displayed in a correct place. Kys5g talk! 10:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're citing an ongoing discussion (old revision)? I doubt an admin will take that into account. Furthermore, being an alternative cover is neither a reason to keep this cover art nor a reason it complies with NFCC. Moreover, being "a country-specific cover" doesn't make understanding of the song adequate. George Ho (talk) 10:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Imagine the article where it is used exposes to an American reader, and the reader compares its cover with the global one, and sees both covers are distinctive, would the reader understand? Heck no! Because it's missing another cover! If so, then will the global cover be subjected for deletion in the future, citing the sourced commentary and crucial identification? Kys5g talk! 14:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- The "sourced commentary" and "crucial identification" are two common circumstances, not absolute. That depends on due weight and balance.
Because it's missing another cover!
Please be careful of circular reasoning in your arguments. The WP:AADD and WP:AAIDD essays should help you learn how to make your arguments count. George Ho (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Oh, and Wikipedia is not a repository, i.e. not a project to hold media content that lacks "encyclopedic context" to justify usage. It's not Discogs or any other sort. George Ho (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Imagine the article where it is used exposes to an American reader, and the reader compares its cover with the global one, and sees both covers are distinctive, would the reader understand? Heck no! Because it's missing another cover! If so, then will the global cover be subjected for deletion in the future, citing the sourced commentary and crucial identification? Kys5g talk! 14:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're citing an ongoing discussion (old revision)? I doubt an admin will take that into account. Furthermore, being an alternative cover is neither a reason to keep this cover art nor a reason it complies with NFCC. Moreover, being "a country-specific cover" doesn't make understanding of the song adequate. George Ho (talk) 10:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep because the image illustrates the credit differences mentioned in the article. Morrissey4Prez2024 (talk) 23:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sabrina Spellman (Melissa Joan Hart).png[edit]
- File:Sabrina Spellman (Melissa Joan Hart).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeoBatfreak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Part of this image appears in Getty Images. Violates WP:GETTY... and WP:NFCC#2. George Ho (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as press photo and no free equivalent (the person depicted is still living) Kys5g talk! 09:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a promotional photo, but whatevs. George Ho (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Image has been replaced with the promotion still of the final season.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the newer photo also appears in Getty Images. George Ho (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Trying to find other photo you uploaded recently in supplier websites, but hard to find in them. Photo might still have potential commercial interests, but that's not the main issue (yet). I can see just Melissa Joan Hart in her ordinary clothes, and I don't know whether that illustrates her character much. George Ho (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was fro. The Facebook page promoting final season NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- That picture OK? NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- That pic is OK? NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Any picture that is non-free that depicts a living person is absolutely not OK, man. Delete it. Melissa Joan Hart is still living. Don't forget there are many pictures of her on Commons, especially this Commons category. Kys5g talk! 14:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was fro. The Facebook page promoting final season NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Image has been replaced with the promotion still of the final season.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a promotional photo, but whatevs. George Ho (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- that was from the show's Facebook page
- Delete as press photo and no free equivalent (the person depicted is still living) Kys5g talk! 09:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
File:FaceTime screenshot.png[edit]
- File:FaceTime screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hajoon0102 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The entire software is copyrighted, but this is a screenshot containing nothing complex for copyright with some text and simple icons and shapes. An ineligible portion of the entire copyrighted content isn't copyrighted. Kys5g talk! 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relicense to {{PD-simple}}. I agree, the design does not meet the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
May 21[edit]
File:KrisWorld logo.jpg[edit]
- File:KrisWorld logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rumpelandrew (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Not the logo of the article in question, but of a subsidiary part that has one paragraph of text in the article. As such, fails WP:NFCC#8. Also fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal.number of non free images in an article, as the actual Singapore Airlines logo suffices. Image looks to be too detailed to be a free logo. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:CM Emmanuel-MASTER-Rodriguez.jpg[edit]
- File:CM Emmanuel-MASTER-Rodriguez.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sonic100jam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC 1 (image of a non-notable BLP, but a free version is conceivable), and 8 (an image of this person, nor the figure held, does not help the user understand the topic) and 3.a. (This is the 6th NFCC image on this page) -- ferret (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:DOA Festival 2015.jpg[edit]
- File:DOA Festival 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sonic100jam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC 1 (image of non-notable BLPs cosplaying at a convention. While this specific festival could not be reproduced, free images of such could be taken at future cons), and 8 (does not help the user understand the topic) and 3.a. (This is the 5th NFCC image on this page) -- ferret (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Cyril Byron.jpg[edit]
- File:Cyril Byron.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JonP125 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is a copyvio and should be deleted. The fair use rationale is not applicable here. There is an entire category of free images of this man on the Commons which predated the upload of this non-free image by eight years. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
May 22[edit]
File:Romanian Intelligence Service - Logo.png[edit]
- File:Romanian Intelligence Service - Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vp734 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The non-commercial restriction is false. Per Romanian law no. 8/1996, 14 March 1996, Chapter 3, Article 9, Section c states: official symbols of the State, public authorities and organizations, such as armorial bearings, seals, flags, emblems, shields, badges and medals shall not benefit from the legal protection accorded to copyright. Kys5g talk! 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Davao City National HS (F. Torres, Davao City; 04-21-2024).jpg[edit]
- File:Davao City National HS (F. Torres, Davao City; 04-21-2024).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Patrickroque01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Violates WP:NFCI and WP:NFC#UUI Wikipedia guidelines. Per this site], the author of this artwork is the renowned Dabawenyo sculptor Kublai Millan.
Firstly, this cannot be transferred to Wikimedia Commons because the Philippine copyright law does not permit a freedom of panorama exception allowing free sharing and distributions of images of copyrighted public art even under commercial Creative Commons licenses.
Secondly, this cannot be kept locally here on enwiki as it is not a building, but a sculpture. Per WP:Freedom of panorama, enwiki only follows US freedom of panorama, and US FoP only covers free uses of photos of architecture, not public art like monuments. Additionally, there is no way this image can be retained here as there is no article discussing the sculpture itself. Per WP:NFC#UUI: "a photo of a copyrighted statue (assuming there is no freedom of panorama in the country where the statue was when the photo was taken) can only be used to discuss the statue itself, not the subject of it." Also, images tagged as fair use (WP:Fair use) are doomed to be deleted a week after being left unused, so even if the uploader tries to save his image by adding fair use tag, a bot will certainly tag is as "unused fair use file" and will be subjected to 7-day countdown to deletion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
May 23[edit]
File:Follow You Imagine Dragons cover.jpg[edit]
- File:Follow You Imagine Dragons cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rockboy1009 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This cover was recently uploaded to replace the preferred North American cover, File:Imagine Dragons - Follow You Cutthroat.png, for an American band in the article, Follow You (Imagine Dragons song). Per discogs, [1], this cover is not even shown and looks like part of the European cover. This cover is from Amoeba Music, but doing a Google search I can find no other versions like this one. The North American cover is from the Apple store and also used in Soundcloud, [2]. The uploader stated it "No reason to have the double single cover when a separate song single cover exists.", but the double cover is the original cover and this one might be fan art. Aspects (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- The cover I uploaded clearly comes up when I search for it on Google [https://imgur.com/a/V1lqtNv]. It is the original cover for the individual song, not the cover of the double single. Also, it is not fanart or unofficial because it is used in the official lyric video for the song [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DoI5WTjd3w]. Rockboy1009 (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Cutthroat Imagine Dragons cover.jpg[edit]
- File:Cutthroat Imagine Dragons cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rockboy1009 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This cover was recently uploaded to replace the preferred North American cover, File:Imagine Dragons - Follow You Cutthroat.png, for an American band in the newly created article, Cutthroat (song). First off, this article might fail WP:NMUSIC and being a released as a B-side to Follow You (Imagine Dragons song), the article might be better served if merged to that song. Per discogs, [3], this cover is not even shown and looks like part of the European cover. This cover says it is from Soundcloud, but doing a Google search I can find no other versions like this one. The North American cover is from the Apple store and is the actual cover used on Soundcloud, [4]. The uploader stated it "No reason to have the double single cover when a separate song single cover exists.", but the double cover is the original cover and this one might be fan art. Aspects (talk) 22:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- The cover I uploaded clearly comes up when I search for it on Google [https://imgur.com/a/vs7igK3]. It is the original cover for the individual song, not the cover of the double single. Also, it is not fanart or unofficial because it is used in the official lyric video for the song [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSAPGjnaKCA]. Rockboy1009 (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gautama Buddha statue at Kyaikto, Myanmar.jpg[edit]
- File:Gautama Buddha statue at Kyaikto, Myanmar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IronGargoyle (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Can this qualify as an "architecture" under U.S. FoP law? Per meta:Wikilegal/Copyright of Images of Memorials in the US: "humanly habitable structures that are intended to be both permanent and stationary, such as houses and office buildings, and other permanent and stationary structures designed for human occupancy, including but not limited to churches, museums, gazebos, and garden pavilions." At least, as per a Commons admin (at c:Commons talk:Wikipedia Summer of Monuments#Monuments and copyright), the Lincoln Memorial does not fit into the definition of a work of architecture. Therefore, the statue does not fit as an architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe the FoP concern would be the temple located below the statue depicted in the photo. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @EmeraldRange: I am not sure that I understand your comment. The temple below is part of the same building as the Buddha. It is all one building. That said, the lower part looks more like a building is expected to look, so why would the lower part be your concern? IronGargoyle (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see your other comment- I was saying that regardless of whether you can go up into the image, the temple building below the statue would qualify this photo as FoP of architecture anyways. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks for the clarification. I think I agree. If this Buddha was not a building (which it is), it would still be allowable as an integral component of the building below (basically the logic affirmed in Leicester v. Warner Bros). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see your other comment- I was saying that regardless of whether you can go up into the image, the temple building below the statue would qualify this photo as FoP of architecture anyways. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @EmeraldRange: I am not sure that I understand your comment. The temple below is part of the same building as the Buddha. It is all one building. That said, the lower part looks more like a building is expected to look, so why would the lower part be your concern? IronGargoyle (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. (Edit conflict) This fits the definition of architecture you give above. Visitors can go up inside the Buddha, making it unequivocally a building under US law. It is certainly as much of a building as a gazebo or a garden pavilion. Other angles of the Buddha clearly show windows, and I believe that there are hidden windows in the face of the Buddha too. I assume that Jim was talking about the seated Lincoln statue inside the Lincoln Memorial and not the memorial itself (though see Leicester v. Warner Bros for why even that may qualify as part of an architectural work). IronGargoyle (talk) 13:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
File:CLE Guards 2024 logo.jpg[edit]
- File:CLE Guards 2024 logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vjmlhds (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free secondary logo that doesn't assist in the understanding of the subject and isn't the topic of commentary. It's a WP:NFCC violation. - Eureka Lott 00:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Logo introduced in 2024 to try to have more of a Cleveland feel to it (showing the Guardians of Traffic that the team is named for). It actually has a clearer representation of the team's identity than the "winged G" does to be honest, but both are official team logos. Vjmlhds (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
May 24[edit]
File:25th Málaga Film Festival poster.jpg[edit]
- File:25th Málaga Film Festival poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Asqueladd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Most posters are copyrighted. However, this poster looks simple, and simple things are not copyrightable because it didn't reach enough originality for protection, because it only contains a circle and some curves with little gradient forming a poster. Kys5g talk! 12:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lady justice.jpg[edit]
- File:Lady justice.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Morrisse95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch. This image is one of many that were used for copyright infringement enforcement requests applying a very strict enforcement regimen on adherence to the CC license. I declined a speedy deletion for this as not fitting any speedy deletion criteria and opted to list here at FFD instead. Whpq (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was the original nominator. I'm usually on Commons and all Marco Verch images are subject to speedy deletion there, but I understand that it requires a discussion here. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
May 25[edit]
File:Mrwhosetheboss YouTube icon.jpg[edit]
- File:Mrwhosetheboss YouTube icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DarkNight0917 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It's rather gray for this logo. It both fails and passes NFCC1 depending on how you look at it. This logo is an image of a living person, so theoretically, the image can be replaced with a free equivalent. Any comments for this? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- This image has an incorrect tag. While tag as copyrighted, this image isn't a logo, it is a photograph of a living person, Arun Rupesh Maini. Delete it, non-free media depicting a living person constitutes violation of WP:NFCC#1, because it always replaceable with other images depicting him. Kys5g talk! 03:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:ChrisMD YouTube Icon.jpg[edit]
- File:ChrisMD YouTube Icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Http iosue (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It's rather gray for this logo. It both fails and passes NFCC1 depending on how you look at it. This logo is an image of a living person, so theoretically, the image can be replaced with a free equivalent. Any comments for this? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- This image has an incorrect tag. While tag as copyrighted, this image isn't a logo, it is a photograph of a living person, Christopher Michael Dixon. Delete it, non-free media depicting a living person constitutes violation of WP:NFCC#1, because it always replaceable with other images depicting him. Kys5g talk! 03:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:H 4 ill 639759 cambodia-phnom penh-1979-61.jpg[edit]
- File:H 4 ill 639759 cambodia-phnom penh-1979-61.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LuckyBirdie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This file has a non-free rationale, but it does not have a license tag indicating its license. Kys5g talk! 10:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Seal of the Bangladesh Air Force (BAF).svg[edit]
- File:Seal of the Bangladesh Air Force (BAF).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FOX 52 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per source, this file is from Bangladesh Air Force's website. Such media from this website is / are licensed freely under CC BY-SA 4.0. Kys5g talk! 13:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Kys5g That means it can be uploaded in Commons. Then it is not non-free. Mehedi Abedin 07:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I also thought about relicensing it without discussion, but I think the uploader may decline it, or it is only allowed in some circumstances. Relicensing the image should have a discussion, either in the file talk or this (FfD). Moreover, this file lacks many older revisions, and I don't want to disturb the admins and bot operators to get a consent restoring them, but I'll talk to one of the revision removers. Kys5g talk! 11:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sketch (streamer) icon.jpg[edit]
- File:Sketch (streamer) icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Http iosue (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is not a logo. This is a photograph of a Sketch that he uses as his YouTube image, similar to a profile picture. We certainly do not allow, say, Facebook profile pictures to be used in this manner, so this is no different. Fails WP:NFCC#1. – Pbrks (t·c) 15:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
May 26[edit]
File:Italian Canadians celebrating 1982 World Cup win on St. Clair.jpg[edit]
- File:Italian Canadians celebrating 1982 World Cup win on St. Clair.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vaselineeeeeeee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8. There's no way that seeing a photograph of a bunch of people celebrating is necessary to your understanding of the article about the neighborhood. B (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:AjyalTVLogo2014.png[edit]
- File:AjyalTVLogo2014.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MrGrosToon23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Styling of the logo to have 3D effects (text) and shine (crest) largely pushes this over the TOO of many countries. Since there isn't any TOO laws of Saudi Arabia that can be found on commons. This should probably be converted into a fair use file. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:LazarBeam YouTube icon.jpg[edit]
- File:LazarBeam YouTube icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DarkNight0917 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
per the other related noms at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 25. Usage of image of living person as a logo. Fails NFCC1. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:TGFbro YouTube Icon.jpg[edit]
- File:TGFbro YouTube Icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Http iosue (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
per the other related noms at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 25. Usage of image of living person as a logo. Fails NFCC1. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Asa Germann.jpg[edit]
- File:Asa Germann.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doctor Strange19 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The subject is still alive. RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[edit]
Today is May 26 2024. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 26 – (new nomination)
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===May 26===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.
The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.