File talk:Countries receiving snowfall.png

I think the map is not should be by political boundaries, but in altitude, distance from the sea and latitude. Of course you should change the caption, not countries but regions and quota. Most of the land is heavily polluted, for example: the coast of California should be dark blue. Northern Arizona is perfectly light blue, southern Chile would be light blue, in the South American countries further north only on the range of the mountain range, Uruguay should be dark blue in some portions. The Atlas chain should be light blue between Morocco and Algeria. In central Africa they would be restricted to small spots, even if it is made explicit in the caption for a common user, it makes an illusion of the size of the occurrence, even though it does not cover all of this or that it is unfair to some areas. São Paulo in Brazil, only has an official report for Campos do Jordão, Rio de Janeiro only in the Serra da Itatiaia, which is extremely rare. And it would eliminate completely the Brazilian coast as of other places low latitudes. In this map, South Florida is prone (mainly to the lay reader) to make believe they receive more snow than the Sierra Madre. What most distorts it is the cyan blue in the Hokkaido province, being ironically one of the inhabited regions that receives the most snow on the planet during the winter. --Kauan Mateus Kubaski (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)